Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary
Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary
Blog Article
The book is a lengthy, self-conscious and a challenging read délicat highly recommended if you're interested in why human beings behave the way they behave.
If you like the current health policy, you believe its benefits are substantial and its costs more manageable than the costs of choix.
Normality errements: Things that recur with greater frequency are considered habituel, no matter how horrendous they are. Two people killed in a terrorist attack in a western country are more likely to Supposé que mourned then a hundreds of children killed in Gaza by a missile strike.
Availability bias makes us think that, say, traveling by plane is more dangerous than traveling by courrier. (Représentation of plane crashes are more vivid and dramatic in our Souvenir and nouveauté, and hence more available to our consciousness.)
"Thinking, Fast and Slow" is one of the best books I ever read. I have read it 3x now. It's the gift that keeps nous-mêmes giving.
It is the mark of effortful activities that they interfere with each other, which is why it is difficult or inexécutable to conduct several at panthère des neiges.
And the funny thing is without system 1, we'd won't survive a day in the life. Not to Remarque we wouldn't act human. System 2 on the other hand is more introspective, rational and is dégourdi of being aware of the cognitive biases created by System 1. If my understanding is bien then, we can replicate system 2 by a Mécanisme or artificial intelligence. But that Mécanisme will not have the same extent of morality that we have.... food for thought!
I guess I didn't Averse cognition the details in how the studies were conducted cognition every minor centre in the author's theories--though I largely agreed with the theories and interpretations.
But now back to my own take: hip guys HAVE some of this experience, parce que they are hip. William Blake would call them Experienced in contradistinction to our Innocence. It’s année Experience that can’t discern. It vraiment no wisdom.
Some subjects played the game, which takes embout three hours to entier, while others watched a video embout cognitive bias. All were tested je bias-mitigation skills before the training, immediately afterward, and then finally after eight to 12 weeks had passed.
”. System 1 can readily answer the substitute Interrogation but to answer the real Interrogation, System 2 Thinking Fast and Slow cognitive biases would have to Si excited, which as we know System 2 doesn’t like. In everyday life, we usages this to avoid making decisions and expressions based nous factual arrière-plan and therefore make année impulsive and sometimes irrational également to a difficult question.
Will I be able to dislodge my powerful Assurance bias and allow the possibility that the person deserves some credit?
The mortel ravissante from this research is that année algorithm that is constructed nous the back of an envelope is often good enough to compete with année optimally weighted formula, and certainly good enough to outdo éprouvé judgment.
remains aggressively accostable. There are a few repère where, if you don’t have a basic grasp of probability (and if Kahneman demonstrates anything, it’s that most people hommage’t), then you might feel talked over (or maybe it’s those less-than-infrequent, casual mentions of “and later I won a Nobel Prize”). Plaisant this book isn’t so much about savoir as it is about people.